M. Borysenko
doktorant
katedry postępowania karnego oraz kryminalistyki
Akademii Adwokatury Ukrainy, asystent Sędziego Wyższego Specjalistycznego Sądu Ukrainy do spraw cywilnych oraz karnych (m. Kijów, Ukraina)
Anotation. The article is devoted to investigation of justice as a form of law-enforcement activity in its
dynamics taking into account implementation of contents of legal prescriptions in certain life
situations. Classification of forms of law-enforcement activity is investigated, features of justice as
a form of law enforcement activity are determined. It is justified that features of justice are
represented by exclusiveness; completeness; adoption of law-enforcement decisions in the form of
sentences, judgements, resolutions, decisions on behalf of state; contents of justice that is
embodied in a certain direction of its functioning; general obligation that means priority of judicial
decision in comparison with decision of other bodies, officials, citizens authorized to perform law
enforcement activity; presence of procedural form where justice is administered as a type of law
enforcement. The author proves that a judgement made on behalf of the state acquires additional
features, except for general ones. At the same time, law-enforcement decisions of state bodies,
local self-government bodies, public associations, organizations, enterprises, citizens do not have
and cannot have such a specific feature and making on behalf of the state.
Keywords: The article is devoted to investigation of justice as a form of law-enforcement activity in its
dynamics taking into account implementation of contents of legal prescriptions in certain life
situations. Classification of forms of law-enforcement activity is investigated, features of justice as
a form of law enforcement activity are determined. It is justified that features of justice are
represented by exclusiveness; completeness; adoption of law-enforcement decisions in the form of
sentences, judgements, resolutions, decisions on behalf of state; contents of justice that is
embodied in a certain direction of its functioning; general obligation that means priority of judicial
decision in comparison with decision of other bodies, officials, citizens authorized to perform law
enforcement activity; presence of procedural form where justice is administered as a type of law
enforcement. The author proves that a judgement made on behalf of the state acquires additional
features, except for general ones. At the same time, law-enforcement decisions of state bodies,
local self-government bodies, public associations, organizations, enterprises, citizens do not have
and cannot have such a specific feature and making on behalf of the state.